In the first few years of your child’s life, you’re going to change a lot of nappies – around 6000, in fact – so choosing the right kind of nappy is important. In the end, your choice of nappy will depend on what factors are most important to you and your family.

Cloth nappies are an increasingly popular alternative to disposables. Many cloth nappies now have convenient designs, cleaning methods and disposable liners.
Cloth and other reusables
There are several different types of reusable nappies:
Disposables
Disposable nappies generally consist of a plastic outer layer, a layer of super-absorbent chemicals, and an inner liner. They come in different packet sizes and are made for a range of ages.
Biodegradable disposables
These use a non-chemical absorption method. When you throw them away, they break down completely in landfill over time. They’re made from a variety of materials, such as bamboo, fabrics and paper pulp. These nappies are better for the environment, but are often more expensive than non-biodegradable disposables.
When weighing up the pros and cons of disposable vs reusable nappies, you might want to think about some of the following questions:
It’s difficult to compare the environmental costs of reusable and disposable nappies. Both have some environmental impact.
Reusables
Some reusable nappies are made of cotton, and there’s some concern about the amount of pesticides and water used in the growing of this staple crop. Using a hemp or bamboo nappy can overcome this problem, or you could use hand-me-downs from a friend or family member.
Other environmental costs might be those involved with rinsing and washing nappies. This releases detergents into the environment. Hot water and energy are also consumed in washing and drying nappies.
You can reduce the environmental impact of reusables by:
Disposables
Disposable nappies create hundreds of thousands of tonnes of landfill around the world every year. They use chemicals in their manufacture and disposal. They can also cause fecal pollution when you throw them away.
You can reduce the environmental impact of disposables by flushing poo, rather than putting it in the bin. You could also think about using biodegradable nappies, which break down more effectively in landfill.
Research on environmental impacts
One of the most widely quoted surveys assessing the environmental impact of disposables and reusables was done in 2005 by the UK Government Environment Agency. It found that, overall, no system clearly had a better or worse environmental performance. No study has been completed for nappies used in Australia.
There are concerns about child development on either side of the nappy debate. Some parents feel that reusables are too bulky and uncomfortable. Some believe they cause bandy legs in newborns, but there’s no research to support this.
Other people argue that disposables don’t provide enough padding or absorption for newly mobile babies or unsteady toddlers, whereas reusables provide support that improves a child’s hip development. Again, this isn’t backed up by evidence.
Some parents worry that super-absorbent disposable nappies will delay toilet training. The thinking is that, if baby doesn’t like having a very wet cloth nappy, she’ll be motivated to get out of nappies sooner. There are few actual studies and little conclusive evidence for this idea, however.
The production of disposable nappies creates a by-product called dioxin. This toxic substance is known to cause cancer, various diseases and other health risks. The amount of dioxin in the nappy itself isn’t enough to cause harm, but dioxin in the environment might be harmful.
Two other concerns related to disposable nappies are impotence and testicular cancer. Some people believe that increased scrotal temperature in the warm plastic could cause impotence, and that there is an increased risk of testicular cancer in adulthood. Research has found no link with the use of disposable nappies and these health issues.
Another concern is that disposables can cause nappy rash, but researchers have found no conclusive evidence to back this up.
Akin, F., Spraker, M., Aly, R., Leyden, J., Raynor, W., & Landin, W. (2001). Effects of breathable disposable diapers: Reduced prevalence of candida and common diaper dermatitis. Pediatric Dermatology, 18(4), 282-290.
Alberta, L., Sweeney, S., & Wiss, K. (2005). Diaper dye dermatitis. Pediatrics, 116, 450-452.
Aumonier, S., & Collins, M. (2006). Life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable nappies in the UK. Bristol: Environment Agency.
Baer, E., Davies, M., & Easterbrook, K. (2006). Disposable nappies for preventing napkin dermatitis in infants (Review). The Cochrane Library, 4, 1-22.
CSIRO (31 January 2007). Fast-degrading nappies lighten the load on landfill. Ecos, 2007, 7(1).
Grove, G., Grove, M., Bates, N., Wagman, L., & Leyden, J. (2002). Scrotal temperatures do not differ among young boys wearing disposable or reusable diapers. Skin Research and Technology, 8, 260-270.
Gupta, A., & Skinner, A. (2004). Mangement of diaper dermatitis. International Journal of Dermatology, 43, 830-834.
Prasad, H., Srivastava, P., & Verma, K. (2004). Diapers and skin care: Merits and demerits. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 71, 907-908.
Simon, J., & Thompson, R. (2006). The effects of undergarment type on the urinary continence of toddlers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 363-368.
Tarbox, R., Williams, W., Friman, P. (2004). Extended diaper wearing: Effects on continence in and out of the diaper. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 97-100.