Any autism spectrum disorder (ASD) intervention is an investment. You’ll want to make sure that the time, energy and any money you invest are worth it. After all, some interventions don’t always work. Some may even have risks. So you need to be careful and critical. Two key questions can help: Is the intervention supported by reliable evidence? Will it be a good fit for my family?
A search of the internet, books, magazines, autism associations and materials reveals at least 400 interventions that claim to help children with ASD.
You wouldn’t give your child a medicine if you didn’t believe it worked – if it hadn’t been tested as effective and safe to use. So, before you assume that an ASD intervention is effective and safe, it’s best to seek out some reliable information about it.
Interventions that are based on scientifically validated and reliable evidence are the ones most likely to:
Here are some tips for choosing wisely and thinking critically about individual interventions.
Question the claims
Sometimes it’s hard to know whether an intervention for ASD really works. Often this is because it’s not clear what claims are being made about the intervention, or what the outcomes of the intervention are supposed to be.
For example, you might want your child to ‘behave better’, ‘act normal’ or ‘be more social’. Perhaps a therapist is telling you that a treatment will ‘cure’ your child.
To find out whether these claims are valid, you might ask:
Question the evidence
As a parent learning about a therapy, you might be finding it difficult to look at things critically. It’s easy to feel overloaded with information, or convinced immediately that the treatment works – after all, you just want to help your child. You’ll also get conflicting advice (even from professionals) about what will work. And to make things even harder, many interventions have not been properly tested.
Under these circumstances, it’s worth asking what evidence there is that the therapy does what it says. The information you find on an intervention won’t always be clear and conclusive, but it’s always best to make an informed choice.
The following questions can help you consider the testing and science behind the therapy.
Some questions to ask about testing
Some questions to ask about the science
These questions about evidence and the science behind it are based on what we know about how interventions are tested.
There are also some practical and personal questions you’ll need to consider alongside the evidence before committing yourself to an intervention. Consider the following questions to help you decide if an intervention is a viable option for your family.
It might also help to read more about choosing disability service providers in our Children with a Disability section.
In this short video, parents talk about finding and starting early intervention for their children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). They share their experiences with different interventions and tests.
As they note, there are many excellent resources and interventions available, but it’s important to choose interventions based on scientific evidence that work for your child.
Article developed in collaboration with Amanda Richdale, The Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University.
Dawson, P. F. (2001). The search for effective autism treatment: Options or insanity? In C. Maurice, G. Green, & R. M. Foxx, Making a difference. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Favell, J. (2005). Sifting sound practice from snake oil. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities (pp. 19-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freeman, B. J. (1997). Guidelines for evaluating intervention programs for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 641 – 651.
Green, G. (1996). Evaluating claims about treatments for autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce, Behavioral intervention for young children with autism (pp. 15-28). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Howlin, P. (1997). Prognosis in autism: Do specialist treatments affect long-term outcome? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 5, 55- 72.
Newsom, C., & Hovanitz, C. A. (2005). The nature and value of empirically validated treatments. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.) Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities (pp. 31-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
O’Reilly, B., & Smith, S. (2008). Australian autism handbook. Edgecliff, NSW: Jane Curry Publishing.
Richdale, A. L. & Shreck, K. A. (2008). Assessment and intervention in autism: An historical perspective. In J. Matson (Ed.) Clinical assessment and intervention for autism spectrum disorders (pp. 3-32). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Romanczyk, R. G., Gillis, J. M., White, S., & Digennaro, F. (2008). Comprehensive treatment packages for ASD: Perceived VS proven effectiveness. In J. Matson (Ed.) Clinical assessment and intervention for autism spectrum disorders (pp. 351-381). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Smith, T. (2005). The appeal of unvalidated treatments. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.) Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities (pp. 45-57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vyse, S. (2005). Where do fads come from? In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.) Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weiss, M. J., Fiske, K., & Ferraiolo, S. (2008). Evidence-based practice for autism spectrum disorders. In J. Matson (Ed.) Clinical assessment and intervention for autism spectrum disorders (pp. 33-63). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.